Happenings: E-Billboards Approved Despite Overwhelming Public Opposition

Note: To the earliest of readers, note that this was edited and bulked up with additional details earlier this morning.

Tonight's meeting was an odd one because I attended in person.[1] I saw Gail Morgan and Ken Striplin peeking timidly through the glass doors of City Hall to glimpse the anti-billboard protest before the meeting. I sat within spitting distance (not that I would, of course) of many city council hopefuls, observing their meeting-watching tics.[2] I even got to shake hands with one Steven Petzold, legendary local punctuation activist, during a casual introduction. But the most lasting impression was something rather bleaker: a sense of the profound disconnect between the sentiments in the cheap seats and the actions of those at the dais. Indeed, despite a protest, a petition drive, dozens of public comments, and an exhaustive effort by Councilmember TimBen Boydston, the vocal public's will was ignored, and the ordinance to swap existing billboards for digital billboards was approved 3-1.

The single most asked question of the evening--what's the rush?--never received a response from the 3 councilmembers voting in favor. Instead, they justified their decision by claiming that those against digital billboards were misinformed and that a silent majority was likely in favor of the deal. It may sound like I'm painting with broad strokes, but they're only as broad as the generalizations tossed out by members of the council. Apart from final approval of the billboard contract, this was also a night where we said goodbye to Frank Ferry, a night that saw a significant change in red light camera policies, and a night that moved council elections from April to November of even-numbered years. With so many substantive topics, speakers, and discussions, the meeting stretched on until 12:40.

Later, Frank

After a thorough thanking of the folks and organizations involved in the Every 15 Minutes program, it was time to say farewell (or good riddance, as some whispered) to 16-year Councilmember Frank Ferry.  There wasn't as much spectacle as I would have anticipated. It was mostly just Frank nodding a lot as people heaped praise upon him for what he had done for the community's youth. Indeed, Mayor Laurene Weste cited youth advocacy and transportation advocacy as Ferry's major achievements while on council. CLWA, COC, William S. Hart and Saugus School Districts, representatives of George Runner and Fran Pavley and Mike Antonovich, and several others lauded Ferry's career in public service.

Councilmember TimBen Boydston was generous and sincere (apparently) in his comments to Ferry, thanking him for building programs that serve local teens so well. Boydston noted his own daughter was now entering the "age of danger" and might well benefit from these programs. Mayor Pro Tem Weste said, "Frank, Frank, Frank," which Frank immediately responded to with the amusing "Marsha, Marsha, Marsha!" She thanked him for speaking frankly--though she didn't use that most appropriate adverb--and said that he said the things others thought but dare not say themselves. Councilmember Kellar called it an honor to have worked with Ferry. Mayor Weste said "I don't think too many people have Frank's sense of humor," which she cited as the reason for his success with educating youth.

When it was Ferry's turn to speak, he recalled having a passion for governing since his elementary school days. He recalled working tirelessly during his early bids to be elected to the city council, scribbling down voter names from city records in pencil for hour after hour. That hunger, which regular viewers will regard as long gone, was somewhat reawakened during tonight's meeting. Vacillating between pride and humility, he cited some of his prouder accomplishments while also freely admitting, "I don't know how to run a city." He remembered conversations with Buck McKeon about how serving on city council is one of the hardest government jobs, because you have to interact with friends and neighbors even after unpopular votes--there's no isolation like that encountered in Sacramento or D.C. He closed by framing his decision to re-invent himself around the mid-century mark in a positive light: he is looking forward to marrying his fiance in June, and he said that his near-death hospitalization in 2010 let him realize what was truly important in life. Applause followed. People in the audience wondered aloud whether the thunderous applause was for the man and his career or the man and his departure. The answer, obviously, was both.

Public Participation

Former Mayor Carl Boyer was the first public speaker, and he succinctly advocated for exploration of countyhood as a means of keeping the governance of the SCV local. Cam Noltemeyer asked why there was no campaign number on a mailer published and mailed on behalf of Marsha McLean. Glo Donnelly mumbled in her usual, semi-coherent way about being sad to see Frank Ferry leave. Sandra Bull asked why some small portion of $80M in unrestricted funds couldn't be used to shore up things at the Senior Center, which she contended is sadly neglected. Ray Henry spoke out about mobile home park issues, per usual. Lynne Plambeck worried about oaks being improperly trimmed, which risked the health of the tress. And Dennis Conn jumped from topic to topic in his usual, extremely erratic (but, at moments, glimmering with the promise of genius) style.

Consent Calendar

The Consent Calendar had a number of items that might have received more discussion on a less packed night. An item presenting the high-speed rail draft financial plan for 2014 was briefly examined, but so much is so tenuous that it's hard to say what it all ultimately means for the people of Santa Clarita. The Senior Center received almost $30,000 to meet a budget shortfall that would have prevented them from delivering meals to seniors in need. Alan Ferdman and others said that even more needed to be done, noting that "seniors eat on weekends too" in light of the lack of weekend meals. During a response from City Manager Ken Striplin, the audience was reminded that the City spends some $600-$700K per year in support of the center, and the possibility of a new (or additional) facility near the cross-valley connector was mentioned. An item addressing the regional water management plan was met with skepticism by speaker Cam Noltemeyer, who said she was aware of many (or the threat of many) deleterious substances in our water supply. Councilmember TimBen Boydston also had some questions about the water supply item, but since it was more of a summary than a legally-binding future plan, he didn't pursue it for too long. Ultimately, the City Council approved the consent calendar with the recommended actions on all items.

Billboards: The Public Speaks

The big item tonight, of course, was billboards. Council had its second reading and considered formal adoption of the ordinance removing dozens of conventional billboards in exchange for erecting three large digital billboards along our freeways. The profits are split amongst LA Metro, the City of Santa Clarita, and Allvision. As you'll recall, everyone except TimBen Boydston was in favor of the deal at previous meetings, so the hopes of digital billboard opponents weren't particularly high going in. The strategy seemed to be asking for a continuation.

There were nearly 30 public speakers, and with few exceptions, they were against the electronic billboards swap.  Gloria Mercado-Fortine delivered a thorough, logical explanation of her opposition to passing the deal tonight. As one of the more polished public speakers (whether you like her or not, she can certianly orate) she was particularly effective, asking "What's the rush?" repeatedly. This question became the common refrain heard throughout the evening. And when it was revealed that the County wouldn't even review the contract until late April, the answer was apparent (i.e., there was no need to rush at all). Mary Smith gave a dramatic reading of a narrative about how startling and out of place electronic billboards can look, disrupting views and changing the atmosphere of whole communities. Tony Newhall wondered why there had been so many clandestine meetings and no public forum on the topic. He also noted that a 50-year contract is a very long time indeed. ("Why 50 years?" was the night's other common refrain). As he terrifyingly phrased it, that contract duration was like 3 back-to-back Ferry council careers. Stephen Daniels condemned the council, asking them to prove their confidence in public support for the contract by waiting until after the election to see if pro- or anti-billboard deal candidates would be elected. Reena Newhall and a local attorney both spoke about major concerns over the City's supposed indemification in lawsuits over accidents caused by the billboards; it wasn't the airtight protection many hoped for. Michael Oliveri asked why the public had to so stringently follow norms and procedures when the City apprently did not, noting a violation of the rule to stop new business and adjourn at a certain hour of the evening. Alan Ferdman wondered if people could trust the SC City Council that they would keep land preserved as open space when they promised to do so. He was addressing the fact that an area that was zoned as open space would have to be re-zoned to allow for a billboard to be erected. 

There were many, many additional comments, but two really stand out. Mid-way through, Cam Noltemeyer came up and asked Frank Ferry very purposefully, "Do you meet the legal definition of residency, yes or no?" Ferry would not reply in what has become his typically evasive style. He makes it seem as if he's not answering to goad the combative Noltemeyer, but one wonders why he doesn't simply affirm that he lives in Santa Clarita. Cam repeated the question later in the evening, but this first query provoked the most audible gasps from the audience, so bold and unflinching was it in its directness. The other memorable speaker was Larry McClements, who wore a shirt with a ridiculous image of Frank Ferry as "Mayor Dude" (his skateboarding, youth-directed persona from a few years ago) below the text: "Normal???" (This was a reference to the last meeting, where Ferry said normal people don't attend council meetings and would be in favor of the billboard deal).  McClements' comments exceeded his shirt in hilarity. He noted that Arthur Sohikian, who has been hired as a lobbyist for Allvision, threw Marsha McLean and Laurene Weste a fundraiser just days after the first yes-vote for the billboard deal from which Allvision will reap many tens of millions of dollars. He said this had made him realize that billboard opponents needed a new strategy--passing a hat around until they collected enough cash to throw a McLean fundraiser of their own. Of course, it was a lot funnier when he said it than now, when I'm rather clumsily paraphrasing it. It tickled the audience with the right amount of brashness, humor, and condemnation. Despite the edgy comments, Ferry left the dais to take a selfie with McClements and the MayorDude shirt. 

Some speakers liked the billboards--most came off as angry or slightly spacey. Richard Green said people had it all wrong and electronic billboards were much better than the conventional ones, and he ruefully recalled earlier tangles with the City's sign ordinances. Glo Donnelly rambled on about how her husband had pushed for cityhood (a very pertinent fact in this discussion) and that people only show up if discontent. A man whose name I did not catch gushed about the wonderful service of the council and said electronic billboards were amazing, recounting a story of watching one change again and again and again right before his very eyes, a childlike sense of wonder in his voice. Berta Gonzalez-Harper was the most capable speaker, but so complete was her preference for the digital billboards that she sounded like a hired lobbyist for Allvision. She also played up intra-city rivalries, somewhat, noting that she lives in Canyon Country and doesn't deserve to be stuck with the blight of billboards that other parts of town don't have to endure.

But ultimately, it was clear from public participation that the idea was unpopular overall.

TimBen's Last Stand

TimBen responded for in excess of an hour. He started off strong. One of his clearest arguments against the electronic billboards was a suspicion that their construction would likely violate the Highway Beautification Act, which forbids "spot zoning" to convert land use type expressly for the purpose of building advertising structures. One of the proposed signs is not near any commercial zones, and so it appeared to meet the very definition of spot zoning to the benefit of an advertiser.

He tried asking some very direct questions to City Manager Ken Striplin and City Attorney Joe Montes, but it was hard getting a clear response. For example, he asked Montes if they were preparing to violate the Highway Beautification Act by allowing for the rezoning, but Montes would only say that arguments could be made on both sides. He could not be compelled to offer a legal opinion clearly stating whether they were or were not preparing to violate the act. Boydston had some less successful moments, as when he went on a long discussion about how much profit the billboards would make, and how it being a lucrative deal was somehow undesirable. I believe his point was that this contract was more concerned with generating profit than with thinking about the viewsheds of Claritans, but it was a bit hard to follow at times.

When Boydston said he had questions for Allvision, a Metro representative came up and a very awkward exchange ensued. Boyston re-stated that he had questions for Allvision and asked if someone from the company was present, and the rep made him undergo a mini screening process, if you will, asking if it was a key question before letting Boydston actually address the person he needed to.

When Bob Kellar spoke on this issue--he had spoken earlier as well, but only to complain about how much TimBean talks--he said his mind hadn't changed. He invoked the idea of misinformation, claiming that people were told billboards would go up but not that dozens of conventional ones would come down. Frank Ferry waxed idealistic about being an elected official and not governing by popular vote, though this suggested more stubbornness and close-mindedness than true leadership ability. Marsha McLean also went on a disinformation rant. It's hard to know what a person's to do: don't show up and be counted among the informed-but-silent, or do show up and be counted among the misinformed-fringe. TimBen said he was sad to see the government taking away such a large chunk of the private sector for it's own gain, and he said he was sad to see the council doing this "to the people." Mayor Pro Tem McLean harshly replied "It's not to the people, it's for the people." It went over about as well as you might imagine. Ultimately, the vote passed 3-1, with Boydston as the sole dissenting member. McLean closed by warning us that a hit mailer is coming out because of how she voted tonight (she had received a threat-by-phone earlier in the evening, she said), and this made her awfully upset.

Edwards Family Bought Off, and Other Items

It was late at this point, so there needed to be a 4/5 vote to continue the meeting. Mayor Pro Tem McLean asked, rather amusingly, how many of them that meant (to be fair, fractions are hard after midnight). The meeting was extended to address a contract item with the Edwards family, which was being compelled to accept a little over $1M as compensation for taking down their billboards. Frank Ferry postured as some kind of hero to the tearful Edwards matriarch, saying they needed to give her peace of mind. As Boydston would point out, she was all but coerced (she said that word was a bit strong, but in the right direction) to sell as part of all the billboard goings-on, but Frank tried unsuccessfully to smear electronic billboard opponents as first championing the Edwards family and then turning against them. I report this not because it made any sense, but because Ferry said it. After the compensation deal was approved, a few items remained.

A deal to modify red light cameras--longer turn window and, most critically, month-by-month renewal of the contract with the company that provides the service--passed, as did an item to switch elections to November, in response to a voting rights act lawsuit. The meeting ended after midnight, and I might type up more tomorrow because it's really late, so for now, this is all.

[1] Here's the agenda.
[2] Maria Gutzeit has frequent opinions which she whispers to her chair-neighbor for the evening, Nate Imhoff; Gloria-Mercado Fortine is tied to her phone and watches with a poker-face; Berta Gonzalez-Harper turns to scowl at people talking/enthusing out-of-turn; Al Ferdman plays it cool, his posture slowly eroding over the course of the evening; Dennis Conn is just, well, Dennis Conn; Sandra Bull sits up front and offers warm and immediate shows of approval to speakers who've just presented--and with whom she agrees; Stephen Daniels starts getting a bit fidgety when it's getting to be time for him to speak; and I didn't see the other hopefuls there, apart from the obvious two on council. As for the journalists, Perry Smith of KHTS arrives a bit late and Luke Money spills things, but they seem to be otherwise firmly in control of their domain.

Voting Rights Settlement, Billboards Back, Ferry and the "Normal People"

Surprise! Billboard Deal Survives

"How very convenient this is," said Alan Ferdman. "I see here a bait-and-switch," said Cam Noltemeyer. These and many other speakers used their comments at tonight's City Council meeting to address the frustratingly convoluted developments in the LA County Metropolitan Transportation Authority billboard deal[1]. As you'll recall from two weeks ago, MTA wants to install 3 big digital billboards along SCV freeways. In exchange, they'll share the advertising profits with the City and remove dozens of conventional billboards in town. But the deal went from on to off to on again at the last minute, and this ruffled some feathers. Briefly:

*At the last meeting, nearly 30 people showed up to voice their opposition to the City accepting the MTA billboard deal.
*Despite the protest, the City Council (minus Boydston) approved the deal. One of their conditions was that the MTA indemnify the City in lawsuits relating to accidents caused by the billboards.
*In the days after the meeting, MTA said it would not accept the provision to indemnify the City.
*On the original agenda for this meeting, the recommended action was not accepting the deal, since MTA refused to indemnify the City.
*At the last minute, MTA said it was actually OK with the indemnification.
*At tonight's meeting, fewer people showed up than might be expected because the original agenda had strongly implied that there would be no deal.
*Consequently, the people who did show up weren't at all pleased. It was a case of fewer, madder people commenting tonight rather than a big crowd, but the opposition was there all the same.

To jump ahead, at tonight's meeting, everyone on council (save Boydston) said the deal was OK, so there will be a second-reading for final passage at the next City Council meeting. Fireworks are likely. And Mayor Pro Tem Marsha McLean, who leads these discussions since Mayor Weste must recuse herself from them, will probably need to clear the room when people get worked up and cheer or clap at that meeting. Indeed, just a few clappers led to her calling a 10-minute meeting recess tonight. But we'll get to her power trips in a moment....

California Voting Rights Act Settlement Costs City $400K (for now), Saves Millions(?)

The meeting began with an announcement from City Attorney Joe Montes. He said that after a discussion in closed session, the City Council decided 4-1 to settle on the California Voting Rights Act challenge facing the City. Mayor Pro Tem McLean was the dissenting vote. The action arises from Santa Clarita's at-large elections, which some have argued have the effect of preventing Latino voters from being able to elect Latino representatives (i.e., their voting power is diluted). Lawsuits filed on these grounds against other cities have been costly if the city chooses to mount a defense. So, on the grounds of a poor chance for a successful defense and an excellent chance for millions in legal expenses, the City is settling. $400,000 will be paid for legal fees, and the City of Santa Clarita will plan to move elections from April to November (which should lead to higher voter turnout) and implement cumulative voting. This voting system would let a voter cast as many votes as there are open seats, but the votes could be used on the same candidate if so desired. For example, if there were three open seats, someone could give all three of their votes to one candidate, two to one candidate and one to another, one each to three candidates, etc. Mayor Pro Tem McLean explained that she voted against the settlement because it was simply wrong. Later in the meeting, Councilmember TimBen Boydston would also express his dismay with the settlement, but he explained that he thought it was the right thing to do for "pragmatic reasons." He also suggested that the main effect of Voting Rights Act lawsuits was "enrichment of the attorney class at the expense of the taxpayers."

The invocation followed, provided by Boydston. He read some words from Pope Francis on the general topic of Lenten sacrifice and poverty, tying the theme to a recent photography exhibit that featured portraits of Santa Clarita's homeless. Then he asked that God bless Santa Clarita. Before getting much further into the evening's business, Mayor Laurene Weste noted that the Senior Center was facing a financial crisis--it couldn't afford to keep up its program of providing meals for seniors for much longer without more cash. She asked that an item to split funding costs with the County be agendized for the next meeting.

New Sheriff in Town, Public Participation Part I

Santa Clarita's new Sheriff Captain Roosevelt Johnson introduced himself to the community and council. He had some interesting words--speaking of a love affair with Santa Clarita, vowing to fight to keep Santa Clarita the safest community there is (are we?)--and was well received.

During Public Participation, former Mayor Carl Boyer expressed his disappointment in the City Council for its inaction with regard to City-County relations. Boyer said that more must be done to ensure that Santa Clarita's residents aren't ignored, brought up the idea of "Canyon County" again, and suggested that a commitment to these issues would be important in the upcoming council election. Alan Ferdman used his 3 minutes to suggest that not enough was being done and/or said about the important issues of chloride treatment and Whittaker-Bermite clean-up. Sandra Bull commented on the sad state of the senior center ("in disrepair", she said), wondering why some would brag about serving on its board when they clearly haven't left it in a very strong state.

Consent Calendar

Apart from the usual stuff (approving minutes, checks, tree trimming contracts, etc.) the Consent Calendar contained an interesting item: approving a 2014 legislative platform. This platform essentially articulates and prioritizes some specific legislative goals of the city. Legislative interests included everything from film industry incentives to grants for alternative fuel stations to opposition to unfunded mandates on local governments. With a few modifications to the language, the legislative platform and other agenda items passed with the recommended actions.

Following those items, the council received a brief presentation on the priorities for support from the Community Development Block Grant which Santa Clarita receives. Job creation, anti-crime programs, and youth activities were ranked as the highest priorities by the hundreds of residents completing surveys.

Billboard Opponents Misinformed or Abnormal, Acc. to some CC Members

Since I summarized the billboard deal background information above, I'll jump right into what people had to say about things. Generally, speakers were upset that residents hadn't been informed that a deal was back on the table. Alan Ferdman observed that people thought the issue was all but dead, so they hadn't bothered to show up and voice their opposition. Steve Petzold said that he hadn't planned to speak on the topic, but the turnaround and threat of view-marring digital billboards had upset him, offending both his "aesthetic" and "spiritual" sensibilities. He explained that, when driving north on the freeway, the beautiful view of the hills signaled an escape from LA/The Valley, but billboards would blur that line. Michael Oliveri shamed most members of the council, asking why Ferry derided Boydston for "filibustering" when Boydston's questions had revealed some important legal liabilities (i.e., thank him for talking, don't insult him). A man from Clear Channel asked why his company had been left out of all negotiations. He said that if the City just waited on the deal for a couple of months, they could offer much better terms for the City with regard to profit-sharing from advertising.

As speakers came and went, there was occasional applause. Mayor Pro Tem McLean was acting as mayor (Mayor Weste had recused herself, as usual, since the billboards were too close to her property and she had a conflict-of-interest), and she had little patience for the clapping. "If you continue to applaud after I've asked you not to, I will clear the room," she threatened. After a couple of people clapped for an anti-billboard speaker, she made good on her promise and called a recess. Whether she wanted to punish people for "disrupting" the meeting or was merely seeking an excuse for the usual mid-meeting bathroom break, we may never really know. After the clapping incident, however, she instructed people to shake their hands in the air (the American Sign Language sign for applause, sort of) if they felt they needed to show support. This led to an even greater disruption, as she couldn't keep herself from giggling at the hand-shakers as Petzold spoke, and she had to explain the reason for her amusement when he asked if she found his comments humorous. Objectively speaking, this discussion, her warnings to the audience, and the recess she called took up far more time than any amount of applause was likely to have.

After public comments, the councilmembers explained what speakers had gotten wrong. Mayor Pro Tem McLean said, "There is a lot of misinformation out there," and asked various officials to explain how the signs wouldn't be like Las Vegas flashing billboards, wouldn't use land bought with Open Space Preservation District monies, and so on. She ignored the fact that most people who attend City Council meetings are informed on these issues (that's why they attend) and simply disagree with her on the value of trading conventional billboards for electronic ones. As with the library issue from a couple of years ago, however, the main reason McLean thought people disagreed with her was because they were misinformed.

TimBen Boydston spoke next. He had real problems with the government taking such an active role in local business (i.e., picking which advertising businesses win and lose). He forced City Manager Ken Striplin to admit that one of the billboards would be built on a parcel currently designated as open space. Just as at the previous meeting, he wondered what the rush was, and he really emphasized the need to get the absolute best deal possible by, variously, negotiating with Clear Channel, having more talks with MTA, and including a gross profit sharing (versus just net profit sharing) agreement in the contract. His words fell on deaf ears, because when he motioned to deny the billboard proposal, he could not get a second.

Councilmember Frank Ferry spoke next. He said that he couldn't believe how good a deal this really was--getting rid of conventional billboards and making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year on digital ones. Ferry likened those opposed to others who had been too near-sighted to see the future value of the cross-valley connector and other major city projects. Then, Ferry said that he represented the 99.5% of people who tell him, "We are just normal, we don't come to the meetings." He essentially promised that they'd be thrilled with the deal--that is, if they weren't too busy being normal to not have any idea it was happening. As you might have predicted, the audience reacted loudly and negatively to Ferry's remarks, but he was unapologetic. He then made a motion to approve the contract and pass it to a second reading at the next meeting.

Boydston tried to continue the discussion, but his fellow councilmembers wanted him to wrap up his comments and pushed a vote through after there was a second. McLean, Ferry, and Kellar (who was silent throughout) approved the new deal, and Boydston voted no.

Ferry Hides From Cam

The second-round of Public Participation followed. Berta Gonzalez-Harper ignored the rudeness of the City Council in favor of condemning the rudeness of the audience. She also spoke about her disappointment in the settlement for the California Voter Rights Act lawsuit, saying that the new system amounted to "block voting" and meant that a candidate like her (i.e., unconnected to special interests) would have a hard time getting elected.

Dennis Conn gave one of the most utterly incomprehensible comments I've ever heard, speaking about "the guy on the $20 bill", solar panels, drugs, calling Marsha Michele, and more. Finally Cam Noltemeyer came forward and asked if she could wait for Frank Ferry to return so that she could confront him (presumably about his residency, which she had brought up at the last meeting), but he chose to scamper into the backroom rather than face her, returning only once her comment period had finished.

[1]Here's the agenda. Enjoy.