At tonight’s meeting of the Santa
Clarita City Council, we witnessed history, God, and scavenging for recyclables
all come under attack. These are
turbulent times for us Claritans, so we best get straight to recapping[1].
I am laboring under a slight
handicap, however, because SCVTV now broadcasts meetings with obnoxious
commercials popping up at the most inopportune moments. Thus, for the introductory portion of tonight’s
meeting, I can tell you that Councilmember Marsha McLean delivered the
invocation, but I cannot say about what in particular. Following her words and the pledge, there was
a proclamation for Hispanic Heritage Month about which Paul de la Cerda spoke
at some length. He recognized several leaders in the Hispanic community, then posed for a photo beneath the
City seal.
PP: Rent’s Too High and the Anti-Petz
Public participation followed,
including two comments about the difficulties facing those who live in mobile
homes. With rent prices on the rise,
many are finding it hard to get by and looking to City Hall for help. The City is supportive of those whose rents
are being raised by more than the legal amount, but it seems any hikes—even
below the legally allowed limits—may be the problem. Another speaker wondered why the City was
enforcing a scavenging ordinance that prevents people from taking recyclables
from bins. Mayor Ferry would explain
that it’s enforced to protect public health and because waste haulers count on
some revenue from recyclables in bins, which scavengers may divert.
The most contentious comments,
however, came from a certain Mario Alvarez.
He gave a peculiar opening to his speech, asking the council to listen
to him using their most "civilized" and "educated" of sensibilities. Then he got to the punchline—he was a speaker
representing those who are “free of all gods and all religions.” He continued: “We are the most discriminated group against." He explained their
goal of freedom from (not of) religion, and restated “We get offended more so
than any so-called ‘people of faith’ when we see phrases like that one up
there,” pointing at the proclamation of “In God We Trust.”
Alvarez said, “We would like very much for that to be removed from the City
Council,” and also asked for removal of all traces of God-trusting from the new library.
Mayor Pro-Tem Bob Kellar
addressed his comments. He said that
hundreds of major American cities, especially Washington, D.C., bear the phrase “In God We
Trust” on their important structures.
Councilmember TimBen Boydston would try to clarify the difference
between freedom of/from religion, but Alvarez tried to engage Boydston from his seat, prompting Mayor Ferry to threaten Alvarez with being
removed if he couldn’t be silent. For
convenience' sake, I may hereafter refer to Mario Alvarez as the anti-Petz. Petz, of course, is the nickname of realtor Steve Petzold, who worked
dilligently to get “In God We Trust” displayed in City Hall—without quotation
marks.
Marsha Frets People Crushing
During reports and updates from
the council members, we learned that Councilmember McLean earned a perfect
score in the “Dancing With Our Stars” charity event. Some $200,000 was raised by the dancers
for twelve Claritan non-profits. Other
comments concerned the very busy Saturday we have approaching, with the library
grand opening, street fair, jazz and blues festival, box city homeless
fundraising event, pet shelter fundraising event, youth grove evening of
remembrance, and more[2].
With their thoughts on the most
epic Saturday ahead, the council members had relatively little to say about the
consent calendar, which would pass with the recommended actions on all
items. Councilmember McLean did offer a
few suggestions, however. On item 3, she
wanted a letter opposing military spending cuts that would adversely affect
Santa Clarita to be written more succinctly.
On item 8, which concerned community grants, she expressed interest in
being more dilligent about rotating grant review responsibilities. But her gravest concerns regarded item 6, which would entail adding many ominously named BigBelly Recycling Units to the SCV.
These units collect and compact recyclables, and they’re “smart” units,
allowing workers to remotely determine whether a unit needs to be emptied. McLean was worried about people climbing into
or being thrown into these devices and being, well, compacted. City Manager Ken Pulskamp assured her the
openings were too small for that, so the good people of Santa Clarita are
unlikely to be squashed in a BigBelly.
Other items on the consent
calendar were plans to spend $32,500 to preserve a few acres in Wildwood Canyon, the purchasing of six
buses for $3.8M from Yolo County (and why not?...you only live once), and
establishing a loading zone in front of Egg Plantation for the loading/unloading
of human cargo, specifically. The
calendar was reviewed and approved by 6:50.
History Takes Time
Discussion of an ordinance to
protect Santa Clarita’s historic monuments lasted well over an hour. The discussion dragged on because the
ordinance on this evening’s agenda was a very weak one. It made the process of historic designation
contingent on the property owner’s consent—a 100% opt-in process. Property owners would get certain tax
benefits and other perks for listing their historic structure as such, but they
would lose the ability to make many structural modifications without approval. Unlike previous ordinance versions, a
property owner would have to be on-board before his property could be
listed. This was good or awful,
depending on one’s perspective.
Thinking it was a good idea were
Mayor Pro Tem Bob Kellar, TimBen Boydston, Alan Ferdman, and others. Boydston had to recuse himself on this item
and speak strictly as a private citizen since a historic (no, not “an
historic”) building is where he makes his living. During his speech, he spoke with Jeffersonian
rhetoric, arguing that we should not ignore private property rights in our quest to protect historic structures.
Many of Santa Clarita’s residents
didn’t fully agree with Boydston’s support for the ordinance, however. Thoughtgul comments from Carol Rock, Leon
Worden, Alan Pollack, Berta Gonzalez-Harper and others suggested that this
ordinance was toothless, doing nothing to force and little to entice property
owners to list their structures as historic
If the goal was saving the most historic of local buildings, this version of the ordinance was not the way to do it.
Despite disagreement in the
property rights/historic preservation debate, there was consensus that some
buildings need protection and that there should be stronger incentives for
property owners to make up for limitations associated with historic listing.
When public comments ended around
7:40, it quickly became clear that the ordinance was not going to pass this
evening. McLean almost immediately
revealed that she’d be voting no, saying “We can do much better.” She didn’t like the opt-in approach, and she
thought a commission for historic preservation might be a good idea. Councilmember
Weste also signaled that she would be voting no, saying she wouldn’t be
the person to vote for an ordinance that would do so little to prevent the
demolition of historic structures. Mayor
Pro Tem Kellar liked the fact that the ordinance respected property rights and
thought that a $5000 check for every person who opts in might work well as an
incentive for participation. Mayor Ferry
also wondered why there weren’t more concrete incentives for owners of historic
properties, and he brought up an idea from last year about simply buying the structures
that are most central to the City’s heritage.
At one point during the
diuscussion, Kellar asked “When are we gonna put this thing to rest?”, noting
that six years of discussion had failed to produce a solution. Councilmember Weste tried to offer an idea,
prioritizing 11 structures (including Newhall Ice Company, Melody Ranch main
gate, Old Newhall Jail, American Legion Hall, among others) to preserve, noting that each might need special treatment. The ice company is still a viable business,
for instance, but all would be watched and funds made available if the structure
needed to be purchased and moved, etc.
City Manager Pulskamp tried to
distill the many, potentially conflicting directions he had been given by the
council members. The ordinance—the public
hearing for which was continued to a later meeting—will be discussed again with
more incentives, opinions from the LA Conservancy, ballpark values on Weste’s
eleven most valuable historic monuments, and language for a preservation
process a la Weste. McLean added that
something about plaques would also be useful.
History, in short, remains to be written.
The other special items—statewide
community development bonds for Einstein Academy and a new EIR for the Master's
College development (200 new dorms units first, extension of Dockweiler second)—were
yessed through pretty quickly, and the meeting ended at 8:44.
[1]Here's the agenda.
[2]Here's that busy Saturday.
2 comments:
I was ready to drive down to city hall and defend In God We Trust in chambers when I received an alert that IGWT was under attack.
Bob should have quietly pulled a coin out of his pocket and read the three elements found on each, In God We Trust-Liberty-E Pluribus Unum. These comprise the three elements of Dennis Prager's American Trinity. In God We Trust is chiseled into the marble over the speakers position in the House of Representatives. Hundreds of cities have decided to display the phrase prominently in recent years.
IMHO it is time for the city to display In God We Trust prominently in each of the libraries. Those who attended the council meeting years ago remember that Mayor Ferry made the sugeestion as to display the phrase in each city building of prominence. This was grand compromise between Ferry and Bob Kellar who had originally suggested adding it as an element of the city logo.
As for the word "cross" being used in the phrase at the Newhall library is still lacks attribution.
Yolo. I see what you did there.
Post a Comment